Friction coefficient tables for solid lubricants, metals, plastics and anti-friction materials
Friction coefficient tables for various material pairs in atmosphere and vacuum are provided below. The data was collected from various sources [1,2,3]. See the definition of friction coefficient.
Material Combination
Friction coefficient in air
Friction coefficient in vacuum
Fe-Fe
0.3
1.9
Fe-Mg
1
0.6
Fe-Cd
1.5
0.4
Fe-Pb
0.9
0.4
Stainless Steel -Stainless Steel
0.5
2.9
Stainless Steel – Cu
–
0.3
Stainless Steel-Al
0.4
0.3
Stainless Steel-Mo
–
0.8
Stainless Steel-Ni
–
0.8
Stainless Steel-Teflon
–
0.2
Stainless Steel-Si
–
0.2
Stainless Steel-Ge
–
0.2
Stainless Steel-Glass
–
0.5
Chromium Steel – Chromium Steel
0.5
0.5
Cu-Cu
0.5-1.0
4.8-21.0
Cu-Ni
0.6
1.5-2.0
Al-Al
0.8
1.6-2.2
Al-Ni
–
2.4
Al-Cu
–
1.5
Al-Ag
–
2.2
Brass-Brass
0.4
0.7
Ni-Ni
–
4.9
Ag-Ag
–
3.9
Cr-Cr
0.6
3
Au-Au
0.6
4.5
Zn-Zn
1
3
Zr-Zr
–
1.5
Chromium Steel – MoS2 (vacuum deposition)
–
0.06
Chromium Steel – MoS2 (friction deposition)
–
0.06
Cu-MoS2
0.2
0.07
Brass-Steel
0.35
–
Tire – Asphalt
0.72
–
Tire – Grass
0.35
–
Diamond – Diamond
0.1
–
Glass – Glass
0.9-1.0
–
Graphite – Steel
0.1
–
Graphite – Graphite
0.1
0.5-0.8
Ice – Ice
0.02-0.09
–
Ice – Steel
0.03
–
Wood – Wood
>0.2
–
Polytetrafluoroethylene – Polytetrafluoroethylene
0.04
–
Steel friction coefficient table
Materials
Static friction coefficient
Steel
Aluminium Bros
0.45
Steel
Brass
0.35
Steel(Mild)
Brass
0.51
Steel
Cast Iron
0.4
Steel
Copper Lead Alloy
0.22
Steel (Hard)
Graphite
0.21
Steel
Graphite
0.1
Steel (Mild)
Lead
0.95
Steel
Phos Bros
0.35
Steel(Hard)
Polythened
0.2
Steel(Hard)
Polystyrene
0.3-0.35
Steel (Mild)
Steel (Mild)
0.74
Steel(Hard)
Steel (Hard)
0.78
Steel
Zinc (Plated on steel)
0.5
Steel
Tungsten Carbide
0.4 – 0.6
Steel
Teflon
0.04
Steel
Polythene
0.2
Steel
Polystyrene
0.3-0.35
Steel
Plexiglas
0.4 – 0.5
Steel
Hard Carbon
0.14
Steel
Graphite
0.1
Steel
Copper-Lead Alloy
0.22
Steel (Mild)
Copper
0.53
Steel (Mild)
Aluminum
0.61
Friction Coefficient of Wood, Leather, and Stone
Material Pair
Static COF
Dynamic COF
Hardwood on hardwood
—
0.129
Oak on oak, parallel to the grain
0.62
0.48
Oak on oak, perpendicular to the grain
0.54
0.32
Cast iron on oak
—
0.49
Brick on wood
0.6
—
Clean wood on metals
0.2–0.6
—
Leather on iron
—
0.25
Leather on oak, parallel to the grain
0.61
0.52
Leather on cast iron
—
0.56
Leather on metal
0.6
—
Sliding Friction Coefficient Table for Selected Ceramic Materials (Room Temperature in Air)
Ceramic
Counterface
μ
Al2O3
Al2O3
0.33–0.50
Al2O3
Al2O3
0.20–0.9
α-Al2O3
α-Al2O3
0.38–0.42
Al2O3
Al2O3–SiC composite
0.53
Al2O3–SiC composite
Al2O3–SiC composite
0.64–0.84
B4C
B4C
0.53
SiC
SiC
0.52
SiC
Si3N4
0.53–0.71
WC
WC
0.34
Si3N4
Si3N4
0.42–0.82
Ice friction coefficient
Depending on pressure, temperature, and the conditions of formation, ice can take on any of at least eight allotropic forms, the largest number for any known substance. These changes impact the ice friction coefficient behavior, as shown in the figure below.
Material
μs (0°C)
μs (-5°C)
μs (-10°C)
Ski lacquer (pigmented nitrocellulose plasticized with phthalate)
0.05
0.11
0.43
Paraffi n wax
0.04
0.27
0.37
Norwegian wax (sulfur-free, bituminous wax)
0.045
0.1
0.2
Swiss wax (highly refi ned, bituminous, hydrocarbon wax with 1.5% Al powder)
0.05
0.1
0.2
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)
0.04
0.05
0.55
Friction coefficient table for materials in fretting regime
In fretting, friction coefficients are different for the same pairs of materials due to changes in friction mechanisms. These tables include some data for commonly used materials.
Ball Material
Flat Material
μinitial
μsteady-state
Cu
Cu
1.2
0.6
Cu
Glass
1.2
0.65
Fe
Fe
0.7
0.65
Fe
Glass
0.8
0.85
Steel
Steel
0.6
0.55
Steel
Glass
1.3
0.62
CuO
CuO
0.7
0.65
Cu2O
Cu2O
0.65
0.62
Fe2O3
Fe2O3
0.62
0.6
Fe3O4
Fe3O4
0.3
–
Friction coefficient table in fretting regime as a function of humidity
Metal
μ steady-state
0–2% RH
10–12% RH
49–50% RH
Fe
0.45
0.4
0.25
Ni
0.42
—
0.19
Ti
0.35
0.4
0.28
Cr
0.25
—
0.22
References
[1]. Mechanics and Physics of Precise Vacuum Mechanisms, E.A. Deulin, V.P. Mikhailov, Yu.V. Panfilov, R.A. Nevshupa.